Évidence par variable — où le cycle survit-il quand on ne moyenne pas ?
Thèse centrale V3 (juin 2026). Quand Gate 1 rejette un cycle sur un agrégat composite, c'est cohérent avec la littérature critique moderne (Wen 2005, Solomou 1987, Maddison 1991) qui montre que les cycles canoniques sont étroits : ils survivent sur des séries sectorielles spécifiques (inventaire, investissement, crédit, prix), pas sur des composites macro. Cette page démonte le composite et publie Gate 1 sur chaque variable individuellement.
Résultat V3 — la lecture variable-spécifique tient pour trois cycles
Source : papers/cycles_refuted/sections/{00_abstract,05_results}.tex.
Sur la grille V3 des 1 456 cellules testables (panel × group × variable × cycle, 5 panels), 166 cellules passent Gate 1 unadjusted (excès 2.3× sur null) — concentrées sur les canaux substantifs prédits par chaque théorie d'origine :
| Cycle |
Pass / testable |
Excès |
Canal porteur principal |
| Juglar |
67 / 605 JST + 12 / 55 Q |
2.2-4.3× |
LH_INV 39 %, chômage G7Q/OECDQ |
| Kuznets |
51 / 529 JST |
1.9× |
LH_HPI 46 %, LH_POP 39 %, LH_CREDIT 41 % |
| Kitchin |
25 / 93 BIS Q + 5 / 50 WB + 3 / 26 sectoral |
5.3× (BIS) |
crédit BIS EM (KR/CN/MX/ZA/TR/RU/ID) |
| Kondratieff |
2 / 16 BoE UK |
n/a |
UK dette publique + centrale brute → recasté R-R |
| Total |
166 / 1 456 |
2.3× |
|
Ce qui est rejeté : la lecture universaliste sinusoïdale-sur-tout (un seul cycle pour toutes les variables) ne survit pas l'ajustement Benjamini-Hochberg FDR au seuil α = 0.05 sur la grille jointe. Le seuil critique p* = 0.05 / 1 456 ≈ 3.4×10⁻⁵ ; le floor empirique 1/(B+1) au surrogate count actuel (B ≤ 1 000) est d'un ordre de grandeur au-dessus de p*.
Comparaison composite vs per-variable : Gate 1 sur les agrégats composites laisse passer environ 25–30 % des cellules. L'écart s'explique mécaniquement — sommer plusieurs séries z-scorées crée des artefacts de variance autocorrélée qui battent un null AR(1), même quand aucune des séries n'a individuellement de signal cyclique. C'est exactement le diagnostic posé par Wen (2005) sur le cycle d'inventaire et par Solomou (1987) sur Kuznets/Kondratieff il y a 40 et 20 ans respectivement. Le garde-fou Roadmap #14 clôt cette faille.
Tableaux détaillés ci-dessous (run précédent B=200, conservés à titre indicatif). Les chiffres exhaustifs cycle-par-cycle (B=1 000 surrogates) sont dans le résumé V3 portail et dans papers/cycles_refuted/sections/05_results.tex.
Lecture
Pour chaque cycle, le tableau ci-dessous compte combien d'agrégats du jeu de données voient ce cycle survivre Gate 1 (dual null, α=0.05, 1000 surrogates) sur chaque variable. Une variable avec un taux de survie élevé est une fenêtre sectorielle où le cycle reste visible ; une variable avec un taux nul confirme la dilution par compositing.
Kitchin
Référence critique : Wen 2005 — Kitchin survit sur stocks d'inventaire / production manufacturière, pas sur PIB.
Panel Banque mondiale (1960-2024)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
CY_INV |
1 |
8 |
12% |
0.029 |
CY_UEM |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.272 |
CY_INF |
0 |
2 |
0% |
0.274 |
CY_PRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.320 |
CY_GDP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.467 |
CY_TRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.688 |
CY_FIN |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.963 |
CY_POP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
1.000 |
Panel trimestriel (Path 5)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
Q_PRD |
0 |
4 |
0% |
0.100 |
Q_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.172 |
Q_UNRATE |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.200 |
Q_INV |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.211 |
Q_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.398 |
Q_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.599 |
Q_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.625 |
Q_CPI |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.982 |
Histoire longue (1870-2022)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
LH_STIR |
1 |
6 |
17% |
0.044 |
LH_UNRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.214 |
LH_EQTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.353 |
LH_EQUITY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.353 |
LH_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.436 |
LH_BONDTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.499 |
LH_EQDIVP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.536 |
LH_CA |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.566 |
LH_BILLRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.789 |
LH_HOUSINGTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.813 |
LH_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.899 |
LH_HOUSECG |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.902 |
LH_DEBTGDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.942 |
LH_BONDRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.950 |
LH_MORT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.967 |
LH_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.991 |
LH_INV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.992 |
LH_EXP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.998 |
LH_REV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.998 |
LH_BANKDEBT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_BUSCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_CPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_EXPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDPNOM |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_HHCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_IMPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_LEV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_MONEY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_NARROW |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_POP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RCONS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RGDP_BARRO |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_WAGE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_XRUSD |
0 |
5 |
0% |
1.000 |
Juglar
Référence critique : Romer 1999, Stock-Watson 2003 — Juglar instable post-1945, masqué dans les composites post-Great-Moderation.
Panel Banque mondiale (1960-2024)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
CY_GDP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.251 |
CY_UEM |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.272 |
CY_INV |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.322 |
CY_INF |
0 |
2 |
0% |
0.719 |
CY_FIN |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.855 |
CY_PRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.964 |
CY_TRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.965 |
CY_POP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
1.000 |
Panel trimestriel (Path 5)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
Q_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.152 |
Q_UNRATE |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.190 |
Q_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.247 |
Q_INV |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.359 |
Q_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.460 |
Q_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.542 |
Q_PRD |
0 |
4 |
0% |
0.770 |
Q_CPI |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.799 |
Histoire longue (1870-2022)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
LH_HOUSECG |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.094 |
LH_HOUSINGTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.098 |
LH_UNRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.152 |
LH_CA |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.213 |
LH_BILLRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.300 |
LH_EQUITY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.393 |
LH_EQTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.401 |
LH_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.413 |
LH_DEBTGDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.438 |
LH_BONDTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.646 |
LH_INV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.662 |
LH_STIR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.674 |
LH_BONDRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.805 |
LH_EQDIVP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.847 |
LH_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.907 |
LH_MORT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.940 |
LH_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.952 |
LH_XRUSD |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.968 |
LH_LEV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.984 |
LH_BANKDEBT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_BUSCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_CPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_EXP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_EXPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDPNOM |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_HHCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_IMPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_MONEY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_NARROW |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_POP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RCONS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_REV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RGDP_BARRO |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_WAGE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
Kuznets
Référence critique : Solomou 1987, Klotz-Neal 1973 — Kuznets pas distinct du bruit sur les agrégats annuels.
Panel Banque mondiale (1960-2024)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
CY_GDP |
1 |
8 |
12% |
0.010 |
CY_INV |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.225 |
CY_INF |
0 |
2 |
0% |
0.323 |
CY_UEM |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.400 |
CY_FIN |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.577 |
CY_TRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.742 |
CY_POP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
1.000 |
CY_PRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
1.000 |
Panel trimestriel (Path 5)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
Q_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.136 |
Q_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.177 |
Q_UNRATE |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.185 |
Q_PRD |
0 |
4 |
0% |
0.255 |
Q_CPI |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.420 |
Q_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.513 |
Q_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.651 |
Q_INV |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.667 |
Histoire longue (1870-2022)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
LH_CA |
1 |
6 |
17% |
0.002 |
LH_BUSCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.227 |
LH_UNRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.339 |
LH_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.360 |
LH_BANKDEBT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.361 |
LH_EQTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.483 |
LH_EQUITY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.483 |
LH_HOUSECG |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.503 |
LH_HHCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.548 |
LH_MORT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.582 |
LH_INV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.668 |
LH_HOUSINGTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.737 |
LH_BONDTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.744 |
LH_LEV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.744 |
LH_BONDRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.745 |
LH_EQDIVP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.747 |
LH_BILLRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.749 |
LH_DEBTGDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.816 |
LH_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.937 |
LH_EXP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.970 |
LH_CPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.976 |
LH_REV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.976 |
LH_STIR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.980 |
LH_XRUSD |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.983 |
LH_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.995 |
LH_EXPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDPNOM |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_IMPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_MONEY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_NARROW |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_POP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RCONS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RGDP_BARRO |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_WAGE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
Kondratieff
Référence critique : Garvy 1943, Mansfield 1983, Maddison 1991 — K-wave : pas de mécanisme endogène identifié, phases exogènes.
Panel Banque mondiale (1960-2024)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
CY_GDP |
2 |
8 |
25% |
0.001 |
CY_PRD |
1 |
8 |
12% |
0.007 |
CY_UEM |
1 |
8 |
12% |
0.039 |
CY_INF |
0 |
2 |
0% |
0.209 |
CY_INV |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.393 |
CY_FIN |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.469 |
CY_TRD |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.831 |
CY_POP |
0 |
8 |
0% |
0.960 |
Panel trimestriel (Path 5)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
Q_PRD |
2 |
4 |
50% |
0.040 |
Q_CPI |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.159 |
Q_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.192 |
Q_UNRATE |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.373 |
Q_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.470 |
Q_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.549 |
Q_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.554 |
Q_INV |
0 |
5 |
0% |
0.818 |
Histoire longue (1870-2022)
| Variable |
Survies Gate 1 |
Total agrégats |
Taux |
p-value min |
LH_DEBTGDP |
1 |
6 |
17% |
0.028 |
LH_UNRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.055 |
LH_BONDTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.119 |
LH_CA |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.136 |
LH_HOUSINGTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.149 |
LH_EQUITY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.235 |
LH_EQTR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.286 |
LH_HOUSECG |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.333 |
LH_EQDIVP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.488 |
LH_CPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.500 |
LH_LEV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.517 |
LH_BILLRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.529 |
LH_BONDRATE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.529 |
LH_CREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.695 |
LH_INV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.710 |
LH_MORT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.756 |
LH_BUSCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.773 |
LH_HHCREDIT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.796 |
LH_REV |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.849 |
LH_EXP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.867 |
LH_YIELD |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.937 |
LH_HPI |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.940 |
LH_NARROW |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.989 |
LH_GDP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.994 |
LH_STIR |
0 |
6 |
0% |
0.999 |
LH_BANKDEBT |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_EXPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_GDPNOM |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_IMPORTS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_MONEY |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_POP |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RCONS |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_RGDP_BARRO |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_WAGE |
0 |
6 |
0% |
1.000 |
LH_XRUSD |
0 |
5 |
0% |
1.000 |
Spotlight : variables porteuses par agrégat phare
Pour chaque cycle, on isole l'agrégat avec le plus de variables survivantes — c'est là que le cycle est le mieux documenté. Les cellules sont les p-values brutes ; vert (p ≤ 0.05) marque les variables porteuses.
Kitchin → LIC (horizon wb)
| Variable |
p-value Gate 1 |
Survit ? |
n observations |
CY_INV |
0.029 |
✅ |
34 |
CY_UEM |
0.272 |
❌ |
35 |
CY_PRD |
0.320 |
❌ |
45 |
CY_GDP |
0.467 |
❌ |
44 |
CY_TRD |
0.736 |
❌ |
34 |
CY_FIN |
0.963 |
❌ |
60 |
CY_POP |
1.000 |
❌ |
65 |
Juglar → RU_BIS (horizon bis)
| Variable |
p-value Gate 1 |
Survit ? |
n observations |
BIS_BUSCRED |
0.050 |
✅ |
112 |
BIS_CGAP |
0.677 |
❌ |
82 |
BIS_CRATIO |
1.000 |
❌ |
122 |
BIS_HHCRED |
1.000 |
❌ |
111 |
BIS_RPP |
1.000 |
❌ |
100 |
Kuznets → MX_BIS (horizon bis)
| Variable |
p-value Gate 1 |
Survit ? |
n observations |
BIS_RPP |
0.001 |
✅ |
84 |
BIS_BUSCRED |
0.019 |
✅ |
140 |
BIS_CGAP |
0.338 |
❌ |
140 |
BIS_CRATIO |
0.500 |
❌ |
180 |
BIS_HHCRED |
0.807 |
❌ |
124 |
Kondratieff → ID_BIS (horizon bis)
| Variable |
p-value Gate 1 |
Survit ? |
n observations |
BIS_RPP |
0.007 |
✅ |
96 |
BIS_BUSCRED |
0.049 |
✅ |
96 |
BIS_CRATIO |
0.384 |
❌ |
199 |
BIS_HHCRED |
0.448 |
❌ |
96 |
BIS_CGAP |
0.769 |
❌ |
159 |
Sign-off
- Date de la note : 2026-05-29T12:54:11+00:00
- As-of : 2026-05
- Pipeline :
ecowave evidence-per-variable
- Null : dual (AR(1) + phase-scramble), 1000 surrogates, α=0.05